Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Pengguna Terhadap Performa Bangunan Gedung di Lingkungan Politeknik Negeri Padang

  • Desmon Hamid Politeknik Negeri Padang
  • Wahyu Aktorina Politeknik Negeri Padang
  • Aguskamar Aguskamar Politeknik Negeri Padang
  • Jajang Atmaja Politeknik Negeri Padang
  • Winda Fitria Politeknik Negeri Padang
Keywords: building performance, level of satisfaction, level of importance, building maintenance, IPA

Abstract

The building performance is an innovative approach that discusses planning, design, construction methods, and the users of the building. To ensure the building functions as intended, maintenance and care are essential. An analysis of user satisfaction regarding building performance reflects users' needs and expectations. Politeknik Negeri Padang, a vocational higher education institution established for 37 years, warrants a user satisfaction analysis of its facilities to maintain comfort in its activities. This research was conducted through a questionnaire survey with 700 respondents, including staff, educators, and students. The analysis using the Suitability Level approach identified three priority indicators for improving building performance: information technology facilities, the condition of public facilities like restrooms, parking, and pantries, and the cleanliness of public toilets. Meanwhile, the Importance and Performance Analysis (IPA) highlighted four key areas for performance enhancement: availability of trash bins and cleanliness of the environment, public facilities such as pantries, toilets, and parking areas, room temperature issues, and information technology facilities like internet connectivity.

 

References

P. Wicaksono and Rizka Novembrianto, “Penilaian Kondisi Bangunan pada Salah Satu Gedung Perkantoran Jakarta dalam Pengambilan Keputusan dan Pengaruh Keselamatan Para Pekerja,” INSOLOGI: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi, vol. 2, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.55123/insologi.v2i1.1287.

B. Giresun Erdoğan and Ç. Polatoğlu, “Building performance evaluation for adaptive reuse: A multi-criteria approach,” Civil Engineering and Architecture, vol. 9, no. 7, 2021, doi: 10.13189/cea.2021.090728.

M. Misriani, R. Riswandi, and P. B. Fauziah Akmal, “Perancangan Manajemen Pemeliharaan Gedung Dekanat Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Andalas,” Jurnal Fondasi, vol. 9, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.36055/jft.v9i1.7536.

Fahirah, “Sistem Utilitas Pada Konstruksi Gedung,” Jurnal SMARTek, vol. 8, no. 2, 2010.

K. Usman and R. Winandi, “Kajian Manajemen Pemeliharana Gedung (Building Maintenance) Di Universitas Lampung,” Jurnal Sipil dan Perencanaan, vol. 13, no. 2, 2009.

R. A. Firman and M. H. Zulfiar, “Evaluasi Pengelolaan dan Pemeliharaan Sistem Proteksi Kebakaran pada Bangunan Gedung Bertingkat Rendah (Studi Kasus: Grha Suara Muhammadiyah),” Repository.Umy.Ac.Id, 2019.

C. Huber, D. Koch, and S. Busko, “An International Comparison of User Satisfaction in Buildings from the Perspective of Facility Management,” 2014. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:166558264

S. Gopikrishnan and V. M. Topkar, “Attributes and descriptors for building performance evaluation,” HBRC Journal, vol. 13, no. 3, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.hbrcj.2015.08.004.

G. Seshadhri and V. Kumar Paul, “User Satisfaction Index: An Indicator on Building Performance,” Journal of Civil Engineering and Structures, vol. 2, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.21859/jces-02012.

Anonim, “Pengertian dan Jenis Metode Deskriptif,” Idtesis, 2020.

Published
2024-11-01
How to Cite
Hamid, D., Aktorina, W., Aguskamar, A., Atmaja, J., & Fitria, W. (2024). Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Pengguna Terhadap Performa Bangunan Gedung di Lingkungan Politeknik Negeri Padang. Jurnal Ilmiah Rekayasa Sipil, 21(2), 233-242. https://doi.org/10.30630/jirs.v21i2.1541