Rekomendasi Tindakan Keterlambatan Proyek Pada Rentang Dan Periode Durasi

Syafriandi Syafriandi; Leli Honesti; T Wendi Boy; Putri Lynna A. Luthan; Monika Natalia

doi:10.30630/jirs.v22i2.1856

Syafriandi Syafriandi Program Magister Teknik Sipil, Institut Teknologi Padang
Leli Honesti Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Institut Teknologi Padang
T Wendi Boy Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Universitas Dharma Andalas
Putri Lynna A. Luthan Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Universitas Negeri Medan
Monika Natalia Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Politeknik Negeri Padang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30630/jirs.v22i2.1856

Keywords: delay duration range, duration period, recommended action

Abstract

A problem in construction projects is delays. The duration of the delay varies, some are only a few days, a weeks or months from the contract plan. Knowing early about of project delay is very important in order to determine what recommendations will be given to minimize delays. This research aims to find the period and range of delay duration and recommendations for actions to be taken. The research method was carried out by questionnaires to 11 respondents, who are members of Perkumpulan Ahli Penjadwalan Proyek Indonesia (PAPPI) with the positions of project manager, site manager and scheduler; have a minimum of 5 years of experience in the field and a minimum education of S1. The questionnaire contains 19 questions that respondents must answer regarding indicators of causes of project delays, periods delays, duration ranges dan recommended action. The research results showed that the cause of the delay was if the project completion time moved behind the contract target, a project delay period of less than 1 week with a duration range of 1 to 6 days (condition 1), a delay period of between 1 to 2 weeks with a duration range of 7 to 13 days (condition 2) and a delay period of 2 weeks and above with a duration range of more than 14 days (condition 3). Recommended for condition 1 are to carry out supervision so that performance effectiveness can be improved, for condition 2 to accelerate duration and condition 3 must be rescheduled by re-analyzing the duration of work, work dependency and find new methods/strategies. The recommendations make it easier for the project team to take management action so that the project avoids delays.

References

M. Fazis and Tugiah, PERENCANAAN PROYEK DAN PENJADWALAN PROYEK, J. Sos. dan Teknol., vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 13651377, 2022.

L. A. Megawati and P. Jawa, Analisis faktor keterlambatan proyek konstruksi bangunan gedung.

D. A. Putra, O. L. Sari, and R. Situmorang, FACTOR ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS DELAY IN BALIKPAPAN CITY, vol. 09, no. 01, pp. 1724, 2023.

T. O. L. Simpang and I. Prabumulih, 1,2,3, vol. 9, no. 3, 2024.

S. Harris, B. P. Alam, and A. N. Wibowo, Pengaruh Produktivitas Kerja terhadap Keterlambatan Pelaksanaan Proyek Konstruksi Bangunan, 2017.

M. Royana, D. Ningtias, I. K. H. Wiryasuta, F. A. Safitri, E. Ariyanto, and R. Pradita, Perbandingan Penambahan Jam Kerja dengan Pembagian Shift Kerja Terhadap Biaya dan Waktu Pada Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Rumah Sakit X, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 19, 2024.

I. D. Made and A. Pramana, Analisis Percepatan Durasi Proyek Dengan Menggunakan Metode Crashing ( Studi Kasus Pembangunan Gedung Kantor Makopolda Lampung ), vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 347356, 2020.

S. Suripto, M. H. Abdi, and E. H. Manurung, Evaluasi Penerapan Green Construction Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Rektorat Kampus UIII, J. Talent. Sipil, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 134, 2022, doi: 10.33087/talentasipil.v5i1.106.

D. Kota and B. Aceh, Identifikasi Faktor Faktor Penyebab Cost Overrun dan Time Overrun pada Proyek Konstruksi Gedung, vol. 1, pp. 512, 2022.

E. Rita, N. Carlo, P. Studi, T. Sipil, U. B. Hatta, and S. Barat, Penyebab dan dampak keterlambatan pekerjaan jalan di sumatera barat indonesia, vol. 11, no. 01, pp. 2737, 2021.

I. Pendahuluan, ANALISIS TIME SCHEDULE PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN, pp. 399408.

P. L. A. Luthan, N. Sitanggang, and S. Syafriandi, HighTech and Innovation Reinventing Formulas for Construction Project Delay Index Due to Management and Production, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 768778, 2023.

N. Planning and N. Planning, Analisis pengendalian waktu dan biaya pada proyek peningkatan jalan dengan metode cpm dan pert, pp. 104125, 1945.

I. Widiasanti, R. J. Saputra, E. H. Handrawan, and A. Fallah, Analisis Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Produktivitas Tenaga Kerja Pada Proyek Konstruksi, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 11991207, 2024.

S. B. Henong, Dampak Pandemi Covid-19 terhadap Penyelesaian Proyek Konstruksi : Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 2329, 2022.

W. Anggraini and D. Fardila, Efektivitas Konsep Green Building Terhadap Efisiensi dan Konservasi Energi pada Gedung Perkantoran (Studi Kasus: Kantor Bupati Kabupaten Sumbawa), J. Tek. Ind. Terintegrasi, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 636644, 2023, doi: 10.31004/jutin.v6i3.16303.

M. E. P. U. U. D. P. A. RAKYAT and R. INDONESIA, PERATURAN MENTERI PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PERUMAHAN RAKYAT REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 14 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG STANDAR DAN PEDOMAN PENGADAAN JASA KONSTRUKSI MELALUI PENYEDIA, 2020.

S. Kasus, P. Pembangunan, M. Pelayanan, and P. Manado, Analisis Percepatan Proyek Dengan Menggunakan Metode Fast Track , vol. 20, pp. 621629, 2022.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bisnis . Bandung, p. 2017, 2017.

A. M. Kusuma,Analisis deskriptif terhadap pengembangan media pembelajaran e-modul interaktif berbasis software aplikasi Lectora Inspire. . Surabaya, Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1-11, 2021.