Analisis Exergoeconomic Pada Kompresor Gas Engine Siklus Miller Berbahan Bakar Pome

  • Ahmad Hasnul Fajri Program Studi Teknik Mesin, Politeknik Negeri Padang
  • Adriansyah Adriansyah Program Studi Teknik Mesin, Politeknik Negeri Padang
  • Hendri Candra Mayana Program Studi Teknik Mesin, Politeknik Negeri Padang
  • Desmarita Leni Teknik Mesin, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat
Keywords: exergy, exergoeconomic, biogas power plant (PLTBg), gas engine, efficiency

Abstract

Energy efficiency is a crucial challenge in energy resource management. One innovative approach to improving efficiency is through exergy and exergoeconomic analysis. Exergy analysis considers not only the quantity of energy but also its quality, based on the second law of thermodynamics. Meanwhile, exergoeconomic analysis integrates exergy analysis with economic aspects, such as cost calculations. This study uses the Tandun Biogas Power Plant (PLTBg) as a case study to evaluate energy efficiency and operational costs. The analysis begins with the collection of economic data, including investment costs, fixed operation and maintenance (OM) costs, and variable OM costs.The results show that the investment cost is $0.016/kWh, fixed OM costs are $0.030/kWh, and variable OM costs are $0.009/kWh. The cost losses due to exergy destruction before the overhaul of the gas engine were recorded at $127.23/hour, with contributions from each component as follows: combustion chamber ($51.63/hour), compressor ($21.62/hour), and turbocharger ($53.98/hour). After the overhaul, the total cost losses significantly decreased to $3.3752/hour, with detailed losses from the combustion chamber ($1.168/hour), compressor ($2.193/hour), and turbocharger ($0.0142/hour). This study demonstrates that exergy and exergoeconomic analysis can identify significant opportunities to improve energy efficiency and reduce operational costs in biogas-based power plants. This approach serves as a practical guideline for optimizing energy systems in the renewable energy industry sector.

References

Kharisma, A., Pinandita, S., Jayanti, A. E., 2024. Literature Review: Kajian Potensi Energi Surya Alternatif Energi Listrik, J. Energi Baru dan Terbarukan, 5 (2), pp.145–154.

Imansyah, L. N., 2014. Jurnal Potensi Kerugian Akibat Penggunaan BBM Pada PLTG dan PLTGU di Sistem Jawa Bali. Tek. Pomits, 3 (1), pp.1–6.

Hakimah, Y., 2019. Analisis kebutuhan listrik dan penambahan pembangkit listrik. J. Chem. Inf. Model, 53 (9), pp.1689–1699.

Cavalcanti E. J. C., 2017. Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of an integrated solar combined cycle system, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev, 67 (2), pp.507–519.

Khan I. U., et al., 2017. Biogas as a renewable energy fuel – A review of biogas upgrading, utilisation and storage. Energy Convers. Manag, 150 (10), pp.277–294.

K. Timur and D. A. N. Pengaruhnya, “CRF = C C = CIC x InsCap x CRF InsCap x CF x 8760”.

Miran, A. Z., Nemati, A., Yari, M., 2017. Performance analysis and exergoeconomic evaluation of a TRC system enhanced by a dedicated mechanical subcooling. Energy Convers. Manag,197 (5), pp.76-87

Humphreys, K. K., Engush, L. M., 1993. Project and Cost Engineers’ Handbook, 18 (2).

Budzianowski, W. M., 2012. Sustainable biogas energy in Poland: Prospects and challenges. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16 (1), pp.342–349.

Moran, M. J., 2018. Engineering thermodynamics.

Published
2024-12-06
How to Cite
Fajri, A., Adriansyah, A., Mayana, H., & Leni, D. (2024). Analisis Exergoeconomic Pada Kompresor Gas Engine Siklus Miller Berbahan Bakar Pome. Jurnal Teknik Mesin, 17(2), 177-182. https://doi.org/10.30630/jtm.17.2.1636